From the quay through the yard and onto trucks or rail, Agile Optimization Modules deliver value across the terminal. With both a strong short and long-term ROI possible, benefits can be translated into financial terms that have real impact on the bottom line. My recent paper Power up your TOS from Edition 73 of The Journal of Ports and Terminals outlines these benefits and potential ROI in detail and is a good precursor to this article. So building from where that article left off, this article will explore the most common question we heard over the past few years: when is the best time to implement an agile optimization solution?
Table of Contents
When to Power Up TOS?
The short answer is quite simple – anytime is a good time because the benefits begin to drive return from the day you golive. However, the long answer is more structured. Given that implementing optimization modules tends to be seen as a capital expenditure (CAPEX) project – albeit with some ongoing expenses (OPEX) –three ideal scenarios align with traditional CAPEX projects in which an agile optimization solution will deliver an immediate impact and a strong ROI. These scenarios are:
• Shrink to grow: equipment replacement projects
• Expand in efficiency: brownfield expansion projects
• Reduce to the max: greenfield design projects
While each project type is discussed in greater detail below, the general principle is that a small CAPEX investment in optimization modules will pay dividends in the form of both immediate CAPEX project savings as well as through longterm reductions in OPEX costs.
Shrink to Grow
Aging handling equipment fleets are an ongoing concern for operations. As
equipment ages, maintenance related OPEX rises. On the flip side, new equipment is an expensive CAPEX project that needs to be carefully considered. Traditionally the solution is to replace aging equipment with more equipment; a like-for-like approach. However, this isn’t the only option available to terminal operators today.
Terminal operators should look for the best solution that can both replace aging equipment and do it in a way that improves terminal performance. This would include improving environmental outcomes, improving terminal efficiency, and increasing operational flexibility. Additionally, the outcome should be financially beneficial to operators (i.e. reducing CAPEX and OPEX costs). While new equipment technologies can tick some of these boxes, agile optimization can deliver them all. To exemplify this, of a fleet of 60 straddle carriers, 30 need to be replaced (see Figure 1). At a typical European terminal, agile optimization modules can reduce fleet sizes by as much as 40% while also providing gains in efficiency. This would mean that the terminal could reduce the number of required straddle carriers from 60 to 40, reducing the number of new straddle carriers required to 10. This provides reductions in immediate CAPEX costs and long-term OPEX costs. Fewer vehicles mean improved environmental credentials. Improved efficiency improves both operational performance in the short-term, while better positioning the terminal to effectively respond to unforeseen future market conditions.
Expand in Effiziency
Despite the best planning, all too often ports find themselves operating at, or exceeding, their designed capacity; this is the trigger for many brownfield projects. Generally, the first reaction to this problem is to build infrastructure and buy equipment to service that infrastructure. Most terminals don’t have the physical space required to expand their operations in this way: the result? Many projects accept sub-optimal compromises that don’t deliver strong value when weighed against the high investment cost. Financially speaking, the cost of a brownfield project is significant. To start with, new infrastructure and equipment
has a very high CAPEX cost. Further, there will be a permanent increase to ongoing OPEX costs to maintain the new assets. These costs are budgeted against future volume predictions, but what happens if those volumes don’t eventuate as is all too common in recent years? In these situations terminals are left with higher costs without the revenue stream to justify them which in turn impacts their bottom line.
There is another way. Stop and ask the question: ‘Is a physical expansion needed or can we be more efficient with the infrastructure we have?’ The answer to this question, more often than not, is yes. The very purpose of agile optimization modules is to allow operators to use their infrastructure and equipment efficiently, unlocking existing capacity in the process. At a typical European terminal, optimization of a five-high RMG yard’s decision-making processes can result in an up to 51% decrease in re-handles. The flow on effect is that less space is needed to handle the same volume of containers, thereby resulting in an increase in the total volume the same physical yard can manage. Similarly, a yard crane optimizer can increase the productivity of existing RMG’s by up to 21% resulting in even further increases in volume handling capabilities. Combined, their effects are multiplied, freeing up underutilized capacity all from within the existing infrastructure and equipment (see Figure 2). Sometimes, optimization gains are not enough on their own. In these scenarios, agile optimization provides the combined ability to boost the utilization of existing assets as well as minimize the quantity of new infrastructure and equipment required.
Reduce to the Max
When agile optimization is included at an early design stage it offers greenfield terminals the highest ROI. By using optimization software, the planning process is enriched with valuable insights as to how efficiency can be strengthened and flag potential issues early in the process. As an example, looking at a typical European terminal’s planning for rail crane infrastructure, it is possible to reduce this infrastructure by up to 25% if planned from an early stage. Similarly, optimization allows terminals to achieve the same volume throughput via yards with fewer blocks. This allows for both the reduction in yard block infrastructure and the equipment needed to service those blocks (see Figure 3). Flow on effects touch all aspects of the terminal design and equipment requirements delivering measurable CAPEX and OPEX project savings before Breaking ground.
Beyond the immediate savings, this approach allows terminals to grow in a more sustainable way. Opposed to investing in infrastructure and equipment that won’t be fully utilized, it allows these investments to be delayed until demand necessitates them. It also provides terminals with room to expand into the future. If the original design called for four rail cranes, but only three were installed, or twenty-four yard blocks, but only eighteen were needed initially, the design and space for the additional infrastructure and equipment is already available for future expansion by streamlining those projects when they are required. Further, terminals stand to benefit from the same flow on advantages seen in both equipment replacement and brownfield projects. These advantages include; lowering a terminals environmental impact, improving terminal efficiency, increasing flexibility, and improving performance. Greenfield projects represent the single best time to invest in optimization modules because the potential ROI is the highest of all project types.
Machine Learning improves the accuracy of operational data used for real-time decision-making and long-term strategic management planning.
Testing the Waters
To achieve these results, optimization simulations are run based on actual or
forecasted data. The representative data is run against a multitude of operational scenarios ranging from low volume, quiet days, through to high volume, busy days. An assessment of the impact optimization will have under these diverse scenarios improves the simulation’s ability to predict possible outcomes. The simulation data is then analyzed and INFORM’s optimization specialists work with terminals to review the results and work through recommendations.